![]() ![]() It's INCREDIBLY close to acceptable, to the point where I'm not even convinced I'm making the right decision here. Given that, and given that there's now an estimated 20 seconds of known improvement just in the swimming stages, I'm rejecting this for now. That leads me to believe that there's likely more improvements hiding around the run that just aren't obvious on plain viewing, something that a future improvement can take more advantage of. According to the linked VOD with the floor clip in the swimming stage, this run is a couple years old (clip is dated from early 2019 and this TAS predates it), and it was apparently not originally intended to be submitted. Given the rest of the run's optimization, I wouldn't consider that reject-worthy, but there was something else brought up that's leading me to the decision I'm making here. Without the clip (which, again, was discovered after the creation of this run), the improvements from zipping would be much less substantial, likely only a handful of seconds per stage as opposed to that nearly 17 second improvement. ![]() By itself, the clip may not even save any time, but combined with the ceiling zip that was known at the time of this run's creation it turns into a single massive improvement, so it ends up being kind of a weird choice to make regarding whether or not the run as a whole should be rejected for suboptimal play.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |